Behaviour of ionic herbicides in different forestry soils derived from volcanic ash
Main Article Content
Keywords
Adsorption, leaching, environmental risk, ionic herbicides
Abstract
Background: Weed control has been one of the most significant factors in forest establishment practices that can improve biomass production, and herbicides represent the most effective and convenient way to control weeds. The environmental concern about herbicides in this industry is because the herbicide-treated area is often located near water reservoirs or areas where rivers and creeks originate. This study aimed to determine the adsorption and degradation behaviours of seven ionic herbicides used in forestry production in five Chilean forestry soils and their relation to the leaching and to generate information to validate environmental predictive models.
Methods: Adsorption and degradation of ionisable herbicides such as simazine, terbuthylazine, hexazinone, metsulfuron-methyl, indaziflam, flazasulfuron and glyphosate were studied in Andisol, Ultisol, Inceptisol, Entisol and Alfisol forestry soils, to be related to their leaching in 100-cm high and 11-cm diameter soil disturbed lysimeters. Herbicides were quantified using high-pressure liquid chromatography and gas chromatography. Relationships between soil physicochemical properties, herbicide adsorption and degradation, and herbicide leaching were determined.
Results: In decreasing order, the herbicides were mobile in Entisol>Alfisol>Ultisol>Inceptisol>Andisol soils. On the other hand, the more leachable herbicides, from high to low, were: hexazinone, metsulfuron-methyl, simazine, glyphosate, terbuthylazine, flazasulfuron and indaziflam. The last two herbicides were not detected below 60 cm soil depth. In general, the maximum soil depth herbicide reached and the percentage mass leached up to 90 cm soil depth were inversely related to soil adsorption (1/Kd), soil porosity, humidity, silt, aluminium, and calcium soil content. Herbicide degradations were generally faster than referential published values.
Conclusions: The environmental coefficients of ionic herbicides were more related to soil properties than their physicochemical properties. Persistence of herbicides in soil was smaller than that commonly reported in other studies or international databases and soil adsorption averages were generally higher than international reference values. The stronger relationship between ionic herbicide behaviour and forestry soil properties endorses the requirement to determine the environmental herbicides parameters in situ, avoiding using parameters estimated in other soils.